epistemological shift from man the wise to man themaker

#EPISTEMOLOGICAL SHIFT FROM MAN THE WISE TO MAN THEMAKER PROFESSIONAL#

It is the idea that one has shifted, or changed, the way he or she takes in knowledge. In the study of epistemology, philosophers are concerned with the epistemological shift. Some people enjoy the old methods of research and writing, but when it comes to expanding knowledge efficiently technology leads the way and is a tool that should be embraced by many. The dependable use of online libraries has aided many in searching for critical sources when writing scholarly articles or journals. Since and individual can obtain information saved on Smartphones and Laptops the old method of memorizations has been less needed. Whether it be the colorful world of social media, the prompt searches via search engines or the ever-increasing pool of available resources on the Internet, the outcome has diverted the population’s minds towards electronic media (Blackmon, 2003). Technology has aided in simplistic forms for creating notes and copy-pasting important information compared to that in physical books which requires individuals to use the old lengthy method of handwriting critical points for future reference. The reasoning behind this is we can access the e-books or audiobooks anywhere and at any time via the Internet. We enjoy reading e-books or audiobooks compared to physical books available in a library for the convenience factor. In the proposed epistemology, we consider this 'picture' as an epistemological tool that may then be employed in the diagnosis and treatment of a specific patient.Ĭlinical decision making epistemic tools epistemological responsibility evidence-based medicine medical epistemology research methodology.Researchers have shown that more individuals appealed to use the electronic medium to access the knowledge then to simply study from books.We take in knowledge mostly online using Smartphones and Laptops. One of the key intellectual challenges of doctors is the ability to bring together heterogeneous pieces of information to construct a coherent 'picture' of a specific patient.

#EPISTEMOLOGICAL SHIFT FROM MAN THE WISE TO MAN THEMAKER PROFESSIONAL#

Instead of deferring part of the professional responsibility to strict clinical guidelines, as EBM allows for, our alternative epistemology holds doctors accountable for epistemic considerations in clinical decision making towards the diagnosis and treatment plan of individual patients.

The medical epistemology we propose conforms to the epistemological responsibility of doctors, which involves a specific professional attitude and epistemological skills. Instead, we propose that a new medical epistemology is needed that accounts for complex reasoning styles in medical practice and at the same time maintains the quality usually associated with 'scientific'. In this article, we build on this critique and argue that rule-based reasoning and the use of general guidelines as promoted by EBM does not accommodate the complex reasoning of doctors in clinical decision making. But critics of EBM claim that such a scientific approach does not always work in the clinic. This includes the use of randomized controlled trials in the testing of new treatments and prophylactics and rule-based reasoning in clinical decision making.

EBM was developed to promote a more scientific approach to the practice of medicine. Yet we argue that the current paradigm for best medical practice - evidence-based medicine (EBM) - does not always support this responsibility. In decision making concerning the diagnosis and treatment of patients, doctors have a responsibility to do this to the best of their abilities.

Epistemological shift from man the wise to man themaker